Below you will find a pasted Mother Earth News article on Monsanto, followed by comments (including my own rant at the bottom):
How Bad Is Monsanto?
12/17/2009 10:53:23 AM
By Barbara Pleasant
Tags: Monsanto, Barbara Pleasant
Recently I spent several evenings reading The Year of the Flood, the newest novel by award-winning Canadian writer Margaret Atwood. In this visionary fiction story of societal and environmental breakdown caused by gene splicing free-for-alls run by the Corporations, the world is populated by strange animals including wild pigs with superior intelligence, and sheep with human hair. Don’t ask where the meat in the burgers comes from, and watch your back when you’re outside a Corporate compound. An extremist cult, God’s Gardeners, welcomes outcasts as long as they are willing to go along with the religion that goes with growing your own food. It’s a cool religion that honors folks like Saint Euell (Gibbons) for his wisdom of useful wild plants
Considering my recent immersion in Atwood’s nightmarish post-gene-stacking world, I had to read the recent investigative report on Monsanto’s growing list of misdeeds (by award-winning Associated Press writer Christopher Leonard) three times before it sunk in. It’s really happening. In 2006 Monsanto bought Delta and Pineland, a leading producer of cotton seed, so that it now controls a huge share of the cotton seed market. Monsanto’s genes are in about 95 percent of commercial soybeans and 80 percent of commercial corn, and people like the attorney generals of Iowa and Texas are concerned that Monsanto’s business practices violate federal antitrust laws that protect free competition. When it comes to licensing agreements, Monsanto is reportedly a big time bully.
Either or both accusations may prove to be true, and while I do care about these things, I also feel like I’m watching dangerous games being played by the mean kids at the other end of the playground. I can mind my own business, grow most of my own food using traditionally-bred organic seeds, and what Monsanto or Dow or Sygenta do shouldn’t be my problem.
But it is my problem. Monsanto is constantly adding new food plants to its ensemble of “Roundup Ready” varieties that resist herbicide damage, and Dow has soybeans that survive being sprayed with 2-4D. That’s my planet, my water we’re talking about. There is so much Bt corn pollen out there that no garden is safe from it, and rotting residue from Bt plants is messing with the life cycles of stream-dwelling insects. With Monsanto and other companies polluting the world with genetically modified pollen and plants, Bayer killing off honeybees with imidicloprid, and Dow turning horse manure into killer compost, maybe we should worry about big Corporations. A lot.
But what really makes me mad is the way Monsanto is trying to hijack the concept of sustainability. According to the M Company video (which depicts happy, remarkably clean third world farmers), sustainability is about three things: Increased production to meet everyone’s needs, thus improving the lives of everyone; more effective use of natural resources, and improving the quality of life for farmers and their families. It does not mention all the hidden costs of reliance on pesticides, nor does it acknowledge the steady increases in seed prices, with a very small number of companies setting those prices, cartel style. This is where federal antitrust laws come into play, at least theoretically.
And here I was thinking that sustainable agriculture was about using Nature’s patterns and human intelligence and resourcefulness to create systems that run themselves with minimal outside inputs, while creating strong local food economies and a cleaner, more honest food supply. At least that’s how we play at my end of the playground.
As for Atwood’s book, I won’t tell you how it ends, but it will make you feel good about knowing how to grow and store your own food. Maybe it will help you think more clearly about where genetic engineering is headed, and help you make better guesses as to how long we are likely to survive. At this point, I’m betting on the pigs.
Comments:
Diana 12/20/2009 7:32:07 AM
I don’t know if anyone here has mentioned it or seen it, but “The Future of Food” focuses on all the things Monsanto is doing. I watched it for free on Hulu.com.
taggat 12/20/2009 7:04:21 AM
If everyone would share this movie called “Food, Inc.”, I think non-believers would quickly start to think about getting there lazy bum off the couch and start to do something about this big brother big business co-op that is spoon feeding us. Plant a garden, hobby farm, do something to rely less on this corrupt partnership.
Allison Day Bees Action Network 12/19/2009 7:04:22 AM
As the founder of Bees Action Network I read Barbara’s comments about Monsanto with a growing sense of hope. Hope because it is very heartening to know that people the world over are incredibly concerned about the insidious penetration of GM companies into the very fabric of our existence.
At Bees Action Network we believe that bees are suffering chemical overload – (in addition to many people)- and we need to connect with concerned members of the public to fight this global threat on a global scale. CODEX Alimentarius is a series of guidelines which the EU is proposing to adopt EU wide. Despite being ‘reassured’ by our Prime Minister that there is absolutely nothing to worry about – CODEX, amongst other things will give the green light to the planting of GM Crops. This is a nightmarish scenario. We know that GM is in Britain already in animal feed, food supplements and plant seeds – we also understand like Barbara that it poses an enormous threat to human, animal and insect health.
Please see our website www.beesactionnetwork.org for information. Good news is the Alliance for Natural Health in Britain has just linked up with the American Association for Health Freedom to become the Alliance for Natural Health International – on their website www.anhcampaign you can support their fight to ban GM.
Merry Christmas to you all and a hopeful New Year!
Allen 12/19/2009 12:48:57 AM
It seems to me that genetically engineering plants is not so bad, but when it comes to making them resistant to chemicals, well that i$ wrong for these corporation$ and we know what their reasoning i$$$$$.
Amanda 12/18/2009 10:41:37 PM
t.brandt,
There is a HUGE difference between hybrids and gene splicing.
Not only are genetically modified foods unstable (having been shown to change over time, which makes them unpredictable, and useless in many occasions), proven to cause severe damage to animals when consumed (organs, stomach lining, etc) but they are even REFUSED by animals when they are given a choice between natural, and GMO foods.
ccm989 12/18/2009 1:24:11 PM
Monsanto is a really scary business. Sure, I like hybirds too — I have a Golden Comet chicken that’s great — she is non-flighty, she lays her eggs like clockwork and she is as sweet as can be. But she is not resistant to chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, etc. I really wouldn’t want to eat her eggs if she was! Fight back — Grow organic food, eat organic food, etc. And if Monsanto is scaring you too, you can sign the petition from Organic Consumer Association — http://www.organicconsumers.org/
Monsanto gives me the creeps. We need a list of every commercial product that Monsanto has contributed too so we can avoid buying them as well.
Michael 12/18/2009 10:30:31 AM
“just an extension of the practice of selective mating to obtain the best possible offspring”?
You have to be kidding!
Perhaps if they mated in a test tube and were stripped down to their individual biological components?
How does splicing a gene from an insect get “selectively bread” into a plant?
The reality of what they are doing is a far cry from what they say they are doing!
So, what PR division of Monsanto do YOU work for?
t. brandt 12/17/2009 3:00:56 PM
While I won’t make any excuses for the ethics of “big business,” I will defend the use of genetically engineered food production. That’s really just an extension of the practice of selective mating to obtain the best possible offspring, started when the first cavemen mated only the most docile wolf pups to eventually wind up with domesticated dogs. We can now select genes across species lines, but it’s still the same principle.
Any change to the gene frequency of a population will be met with reciprocal adaptations in the other species affected in the web.We can’t predict those results, but an equilibrium will be achieved.
But we have the dilemma of feeding a growing population: we have painted ourselves into the corner by supporting population increases with increased farm yield thru technology. To stop now would force a sudden lowering of the carrying capacity and a subsequent die-off of population. Any volunteers?
Darci’s Rant 12/20/2009
To the suspected Monsanto PR rep, t brandt, do you not see that there is a tremendous die-off of species at this very moment, and will surely include us soon if we do not stop destroying what sustains us?
And it’s not just Monsanto. As Allen implied, there is an ethics of capitalism going on here that is clouding any other system of ethics. ‘Everyone for themselves’ is not working.
We must unify against all rapings of nature and human labor, and not segregate causes. There must be a million organizations in the world fighting for the same cause in one little way, like the Bees Action Network mentioned above.
The people in power rely on our isolation from each other. If we compartmentalize the problem and constantly compete for media attention and funding, there will never be unity.
Now is the time to prepare for needed unified action. It starts with economy. Contrary to popular belief, ‘economy’ is not a massive force hovering above us, full of indecipherable formulas, theories, and figures. Economy is any creation or exchange. Economy is me writing this message (creating/exchanging information). Economy is baking a cake and sharing with a friend. Economy is changing your oil.
To regain control of the economy, and therefore our time, labor, relationships, community, space, and materiality, everyone must learn how to make or fix something, anything. Once we regain craftsmanship and ownership of our own work, we can begin to exchange it amongst ourselves. Systems of taxation, wage labor, schooling, enforcement of laws and codes, and real estate serve to constantly nickel and dime us, and we see next to no benefit.
For example, the recent rise in tobacco taxes. Rolling tobacco, specifically, doubled in price here in California, from $6/pack to $12/pack for American Spirit (also see the ban on Kretek clove cigarettes). Generally, no one will argue with a tax on tobacco, since we have agreed as a culture that smoking the plant is ‘bad,’ and all assume that the tax is going to support public health programs to reduce the prevalence of habitual smoking and health care for those who smoke. Do you see any increase in any social services since the tax increase? There is none. With all that we pay into our government, what do we receive in return? Who knows where that money goes?
It may not seem so, but that money is a translation of our time and energy– essentially our life. Portions of our lives are being sucked away from us to support the money-making schemes of those in power.
Our only hope is to learn how to subsist within our own communities, and form our own connections to food, water, and energy. It will take resourcefullness, skill, and frugality. No more ‘going shopping’ for recreation. Instead ‘go shopping’ for some wild edible plants, or raw materials for crafting goods. Same pleasure, more pride, and no money or plastic involved.
There is so much hype over Decemeber 2012 as a date. To me, it doesn’t particularly matter wether or not the hype is ’true.’ Rather, it will be whatever we make it. Why don’t we harness the hype and mark the date for ourselves? —when all who have little to no faith in the above corrupt systems stop investing in them and set their alternative system in motion.